Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Re Kekhman (UK, 2014)


Essential reading:
Bankruptcy "tourism": Russian banks fail to annul English bankruptcy of Russian businessman
Accessibility of English bankruptcy to foreign debtors—JSC Bank of Moscow v Kekhman

Additional reading:
Банкрут, или Дома хорошо, а в гостях лучше [see links inside]

Technical reading:
Judgment

Issues for discussion:

1)      What court considered the case? Who were the parties? What was the principal issue?
2)      Did the English court have jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case under English law?
3)      The applicants argued that the court had to exercise its discretion to dismiss the bankruptcy case.  What was their arguments in favor of that proposition? Do you think they were right?
4)      One of the issues was whether or not the English judgment in the bankruptcy case may be recognized in Russia.  Why is it important? 
5)      Generally, how an English court resolves issues of foreign law?  Who were the expert witnesses in this case?
6)      The judge changed his mind on the issue of whether or not the judgment may be recognized in Russia. Did it affect the ultimate outcome of the case?

7)      What was the outcome?  What are its probable practical consequences?  may it be recognized in Russia? In other countries? 

No comments:

Post a Comment